Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter traces the development of rout/e, a poetry press (“footpress”) through which poems are installed along, or slightly off, trails in Eastern Ontario, Canada. This chapter considers the various features and processes, physical and conceptual, that affect the poems and the habitats in which they are encountered; through rout/e, poems are exposed to multiple influences and interactions that typically alter them. Whereas a bookshelf or library keeps poems pristine or collected in a literary, conceptual landscape, poems on and in the land, accessible by trails, emphasize the page, and the language on it, as a changeable landscape; the poems are read within a multiplicity of other markings and sounds, many of which are unrecognized by the human eye and ear. Trails serve many functions; for example, they can make for easier explorations of varied habitats and terrains by enabling movement over a variety of distances and through disparate geographies. The language of a poem, and the spatialization of a page, requires conceptual navigation and a reader’s willingness to access meaning in particular ways. In the rout/e project, each poem and its habitat are documented over several years (or until the poem disappears); contributions to rout/e are posted online, non-chronologically, with images and brief narratives that describe the poem in place (or displaced).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.171 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".