MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253638248 · doi:10.1159/000447463

Scientific Programme

2016· article· en· W4253638248 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Thyroid Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersMedical Center, University of RochesterUniversità degli Studi di FerraraUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaUniversität zu LübeckUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreUniversità degli Studi di PerugiaUniversità di PisaMuséum National d'Histoire NaturelleNational University of SingaporeUniversitat de BarcelonaUniversité Paris DiderotUniversità degli Studi di TorinoUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeUniversità degli Studi di VeronaUniversity of GlasgowKarolinska InstitutetMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaKosin UniversityUniversity of RochesterCollege of Medicine, Koisin UniversityUniversiteit van AmsterdamSwansea UniversityCardiff UniversityUniversità degli Studi di Milano
KeywordsMedicineFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Who should be screened for thyroid nodules

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Thyroid JournalSame topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207