MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253739573 · doi:10.5325/jmorahist.16.2.0174

In the Footsteps of Abraham Ulrikab: The Events of 1880–1881 and The Voyage with the Labrador Eskimos 1880–1881

2016· article· en· W4253739573 on OpenAlexaffabout
Linda Sabathy-Judd

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Moravian History · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeHistoryAncient historyTragedy (event)BishopsEPICClassicsGeographyArt historyArtLawPolitical scienceLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A widespread interest in the science of “types of mankind” in late nineteenth-century Europe encouraged the often-lucrative business of importing human “specimens” from various parts of the world to be exhibited to curious crowds in zoos in cities like Berlin, Hamburg, Darmstadt, Prague, Paris, and others. In 1881 Norwegian ethnographer Johan Jacobsen, in the employ of Carl Hagenbeck, owner and operator of the Hamburg zoo, sailed to Greenland and Labrador, hoping to recruit a number of Inuit willing to make the journey and be thus exhibited in artificially contrived “natural” habitats for pay. Jacobsen was not successful in Greenland but achieved his purpose in Labrador where eight Inuit accepted his offer: three from the area of Nachvak Fjord, and five from Hebron, a Christian community founded by Moravian missionaries in 1831.The volunteers from Nachvak included Tigiannak, his wife, Paingu, and their daughter Nuggasak. The Hebron Inuit were Abraham and Ulrike, a married couple, their two small children, Sara and Maria, and a spirited youth named Tobias. Jacobsen was delighted to have both “wild” and “civilized” Labrador natives for display and hoped for a good return on his and his employer's investment. To his dismay, the enterprise ended in tragedy as all perished from smallpox within four months of stepping foot on European soil. None had been vaccinated against the deadly disease. This tragic event in Canadian history is generally not well known, a fact that France Rivet has remedied with her book. By means of lengthy excerpts from original documents written by people directly involved, as well as contemporary comments by outsiders and observers, Rivet gives the reader a firsthand account of much of this sorry tale. Manuscript documents include English translations of private journals kept by Jacobsen and Abraham, the latter's literacy reflecting his Moravian education. Rivet also offers German newspaper articles, letters by Moravian missionaries on both sides of the Atlantic, as well as quotations from the Periodical Accounts relating to the Foreign Missions of the Church of the United Brethren. Also included are findings by anthropologists engaged in comparison studies of “Eskimos” from various northern regions of the globe, as well as autopsy reports and medical research done on Inuit bodies after they had been exhumed.The two key documents, however, are Jacobsen's journal and Abraham's brief but telling diary. Jacobsen's journal, originally written in German, was translated into English by Harman Lutz. It was published as a companion volume to Rivet's work and Rivet quotes extensively from it. Jacobsen's journal speaks to the various navigational challenges of a voyage to Greenland and Labrador in the late nineteenth century; it tells of his chronic illness as well as the debilitating sea sickness his Inuit volunteers suffered crossing the Atlantic. It records early successes with the European exhibitions and gives detailed accounts of the Inuit's illness and death. Abraham's diary, written in Inuktitut, was translated into German by the Moravians, and into English by Hartman Lutz also. Abraham wrote of his reactions to European society, about his fears and regrets for having exposed his family to such a dangerous undertaking, and of his desperate longing for home. Newspaper articles, on the other hand, provide insight to how European society perceived and reacted to human novelties from North America. Moravian missionaries in Labrador, upset by the whole business, wrote of their concerns and lament their inability to stop the Inuit from going with Jacobsen. Medical and anthropological reports speak to the level of nineteenth-century science.Rivet's work is well researched and annotated. By putting document excerpts in chronological order and connecting them with brief historical narrative, she succeeds in shedding a good deal of light on the story. She concedes that her work is not the final word as there are yet more questions to be answered. The work is well illustrated with photographs, maps, and a number of graphs and tables, as well as several useful appendices, including a “Chronological Summary of Events” and all of Abraham's translated diary. An outraged response to exhibiting humans in zoos, written by the Vicomte De Challans of Paris, serves effectively as the foreword. There is no formal introduction. Rather, some historical context and the author's interest in the story, and the challenges in bringing it to light, are discussed in the preface. Here, the first-person singular is frequently used.What detracts from the overall effectiveness of the book is its curious and unconventional format. Lengthy manuscript excerpts are boxed in, as it were, with lines of various widths and numbers. For example, newspaper articles are encased with double lines, while excerpts from Abraham's diary are surrounded by a single line in boldface. Similarly, Jacobsen's diary excerpts are surrounded by a regular font single line. Shorter documents, like letters, are not encased. Here, a footnote number is given at the beginning of the citation rather than the end. While the formatting method is explained at the beginning of the work, the effects remain fractious and interfere with the flow of the story. Nevertheless, In the Footsteps of Abraham Ulrikab is a valuable contribution to ethnohistory, to Canadian history in general, and to the history of Labrador in particular.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Moravian HistorySame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207