MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253755668 · doi:10.4021/jmc53w

Surgery for Primary Tracheal Tumors: Experience on Four Cases

2010· article· en· W4253755668 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maruf Şanlı

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryAdenoidAdenoid cystic carcinomaSchwannomaFistulaCarcinomaRadiation therapyTracheotomyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary tracheal tumors are rare occurrences. The most commonly seen type is the epidermoid carcinoma followed by adenoid cystic carcinoma. Despite being less frequent, schwannomas of primary tracheal origin can also be seen. Of such cases, we had four who had been operated: three for adenoid cystic carcinoma and one for tracheal schwannoma. We analyzed the experiences of our clinic besed on these cases and compared this to those of reported cases. All cases underwent tracheal resection with median sternotomy. One case required additional left hemi-clamshell incision. One case died due to a tracheavascular fistula that developed during the operation. Other cases are at second, third and seventh postoperative years and free of problems. Despite all known risks, the most appropriate type of treatment for primary tracheal tumors is surgery. Radiotherapy is administered as an adjunct treatment to such patients. The rate of fatal complications increases together with the increase in the size of the tracheal segment to be resected. J Med Cases. 2010;1(3):87-91 doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jmc53w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicSalivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207