MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253771444 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2014.7417469

A Public Vehicle System with Multiple Origin-Destination Pairs on Traffic Networks

2014· article· en· W4253771444 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Zhu, Linghe Kong, Xiao-Yang Liu, Ruimin Shen, Wei Shu, Min‐You Wu

Bibliographic record

Venue2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaxisPublic transportComputer scienceTraffic congestionScheduling (production processes)Travelling salesman problemKey (lock)Path (computing)Energy consumptionTraffic systemTransport engineeringReal-time computingComputer networkMathematical optimizationEngineeringComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Substantial technology advances have been made in areas of autonomous and connected vehicles, which opens a wide landscape for future transportation systems. We propose a new type of transportation system, Public Vehicle (PV) system, to provide effective, comfortable, and convenient service. The PV system is to improve the efficiency of current transportation systems, \eg, taxi system. Meanwhile, the design of such a system targets on significant reduction in energy consumption, traffic congestion, and provides solutions with affordable cost. The key issue of implementing an effective PV system is to design efficient scheduling algorithms. We formulate it as the PV Path (PVP) problem, and prove it is NP-Complete. Then we introduce a real time approach, which is based on solutions of the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and it can serve people efficiently with lower costs. Our results show that to achieve the same performance (e.g., the total time: waiting and travel time), the number of vehicles can be reduced by 47%-69%, compared with taxis. The number of vehicles on roads is reduced, thus traffic congestion is relieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)Same topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207