MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253781546 · doi:10.1504/ijcsm.2020.111109

Detection of brain tumour by using moments and transforms on segmented magnetic resonance brain images

2020· article· en· W4253781546 on OpenAlexaff
Ajay Prashar, Rahul Upneja

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computing Science and Mathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZernike polynomialsBrain cancerMagnetic resonance imagingArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionNuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsNuclear medicineMedicineCancerRadiologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brain tumour occurs when abnormal cells appear within the brain. Primary tumour starts with abnormal growth of brain cells whereas Secondary (Metastatic) tumour initiates as cancer in other parts of the body and spread to the brain through blood stream. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to detect tumour in magnetic resonance (MR) brain images. The proposed method uses improved incremental self organise mapping (I2SOM) to segment the brain image and to calculate asymmetry Zernike moments (ZMs), Pseudo-Zernike moments (PZMs) and orthogonal Fourier Mellin moments (OFMMs) are used. It omits the limitation of pre-determination of class of input data and the manual setting of appropriate threshold value. The effectiveness of the proposed method is analysed by doing experiments on 30 MR brain images with tumour and 30 normal MR brain images. It is observed that tumour detection is successfully realised for 30 MR brain images with tumour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Computing Science and MathematicsSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207