MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PREFACE

2021· article· en· W4253821586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet of Things and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)Government (linguistics)ChinaProsperityOrder (exchange)Public relationsPolitical sciencePostponementMedia studiesLibrary scienceEngineeringOperations researchSociologyBusinessComputer scienceMarketingLawMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently the entire world is struggling against the virulent pandemic COVID-19. Unfortunately, each of us is affected, either directly or indirectly. Our conference, 2020 International Conference on Industrial Applications of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (BDAI 2020) was not an exception. In November, mass gatherings are not permitted by the government in China to protect people. It is uncertain when the COVID-19 will end, so it remains unclear for postponement time, while many scholars and researchers wanted to attend this long-waited conference and have academic exchanges with their peers. Therefore, in order to actively respond the call of the government, and meet author’s request, the BDAI 2020, which was planned to be held in Shenzhen, China from November 26 to 29, 2020, was changed to be held on November 26, 2020 online through Tencent VooV software. This approach not only avoids people gathering, but also meets their communication needs. Each keynote speech lasted 40 minutes, invited speech 30 minutes and authors presentation 15 minutes. Each presentation was included with questions and answers. There was lively discussion at the conference, which promotes the academic exchange. The success and prosperity of the conference is reflected high level of the papers received. BDAI 2020 became an effective communication platform for all the participants over the world. BDAI 2020 was organized by Hong Kong Society of Mechanical Engineers. This conference aims to provide a platform for researchers and engineers to share their ideas, recent developments, and successful practices in Industrial Applications of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. More than 40 participants attended the conference, they were from USA, Australia, UK, Malaysia, South Korea, India, Swiss, China and more. Four renowned speakers given speeches about their latest research and reports. They are: Prof. Dan Zhang, York University, Canada; Prof. DP Sharma, AMUIT under UNDP & Academic Ambassador, Cloud Computing (AI), IBM, USA; Prof. Amir H. Gandomi, University of Technology Sydney, Australia; Assoc. Prof. Simon James Fong, University of Macau, Macau S.A.R., China. The conference also had 1 technical session and 1 poster sessions. The conference proceeding is a compilation of the accepted papers and represent an interesting outcome of the conference. This book covers 2 chapters: 1. Big Data and AI Technologies; 2. Big Data and AI Applications. We would like to acknowledge all of those who supported BDAI 2020. Each individual and institutional help were very important for the success of this conference. Especially we would like to thank the committee chairs, committee members and reviewers, for their tremendous contribution in conference organization and peer review of the papers. We sincerely hope that BDAI 2020 will be a forum for excellent discussions that will put forward new ideas and promote collaborative research. We are sure that the proceedings will serve as an important research source of references and the knowledge, which will lead to not only scientific and engineering progress but also other new products and processes. Finally, we would like to thank the organization and committee for all their hard work and support and hope to meet you all in person at our next conference. Prof. Dan Zhang Conference Chairman

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicInternet of Things and AIFrench-language works237,207