MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253834589 · doi:10.12700/aph.16.4.2019.4.11

A Hybrid Time Series Forecasting Model for Disturbance Storm Time Index using a Competitive Brain Emotional Neural Network and Neo-Fuzzy Neurons

2019· article· en· W4253834589 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Polytechnica Hungarica · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDisturbance (geology)Index (typography)Series (stratigraphy)Time seriesComputer scienceArtificial neural networkFuzzy logicStormArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMeteorologyGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Disturbance storm time (Dst) index is an important indicator of the occurrence of geomagnetic storms, which can damage communication and power systems, as well as, affect Astronauts performance. Such potential consequences of this fatal event has challenged researchers to develop Dst predictors, with some success. This paper presents the design of a computationally fast, neuro-fuzzy network to forecast Dst activity. The proposed network combines a class of emotional neural networks with neo-fuzzy neurons and is named, Neo-fuzzy integrated Competitive Brain Emotional Learning (NFCBEL) network. Equipped with five competing units, the hybrid model accepts only the past two samples of Dst time series, to predict future values. The model has been tested in the MATLAB programming environment and has been found to offer superior performance, as compared to other state-of-the-art Dst predictors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it