MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253887046 · doi:10.4000/ifha.8399

Kerstin Hitzbleck/Klara Hübner (dir.), Die Grenzen des Netzwerks 1200-1600

2015· article· fr· W4253887046 on OpenAlexaff
Gisela Naegle

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Cultural Studies of Poland
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La publication dirigée par Kerstin Hitzbleck et Klara Hübner est issue d’un colloque consacré aux limites ou « frontières » (Grenzen) du concept scientifique de réseau (Netzwerks). À ses origines, cet outil méthodique fut développé par les sciences sociales, particulièrement par la sociologie et l’anthropologie, par exemple sous forme de la Social Network Analysis (p. 44). Cependant, plusieurs auteurs soulignent à juste titre que les sources médiévales ne se prêtent pas à un transfert direct ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicHistorical and Cultural Studies of PolandFrench-language works237,207