MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253893901 · doi:10.3406/ahrf.2004.2707

La guérilla espagnole dans la guerre contre l'armée napoléonienne

2004· article· en· W4253893901 on OpenAlexaff
Vittorio Scotti Douglas

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattleCitizen journalismGuerrilla warfarePopulationPolitical scienceMeaning (existential)Order (exchange)HistoryLawHumanitiesSociologyAncient historyArtPsychologyPoliticsDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vittorio Scotti Douglas, The Spanish Guerrilla War against Napoleons Army. After discussing the change in meaning of the Spanish word guerrilla, from the original sense of "secondary military operation conducted by small groups of soldiers" to the modern one of "armed civilian struggle against an invader/occupier and their allies", the problem raised is that of the military effectiveness of the anti-Napoleonic guerrilla war. Four aspects are reviewed : the losses inflicted by the guerrillas on the Imperial army ; the communication difficulties arising, including the obstacles put in the way of troop supplies ; finally, the need for the Imperial army to use the greater part of their forces to control the territory, thus preventing them from making use of their numerical superiority in the order of battle against the Anglo-Luso-Spanish armies. Guerrilla warfare was also a non-negligible means of bringing psychological support to the Spanish population, while the Imperial troops dreaded the prospect of being sent to Spain, where they set foot already undermined by fear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicHistorical Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207