MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Management of Scoliosis and Syringomyelia in Children

2002· article· en· W4253936782 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineScoliosisSyrinx (medicine)SyringomyeliaForamen magnumSurgeryRachisDecompressionMagnetic resonance imagingRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scoliosis is often a characteristic of an underlying syrinx. Surgical treatment, in particular instrumentation, of scoliosis in a child with an unrecognized syrinx may be associated with an increased risk of neurologic complications. The effect of syrinx treatment on scoliosis is yet to be clearly determined. Since 1976, nine children with scoliosis and a syrinx have been treated at a major pediatric referral center. Follow-up averaged 4 years 9 months. The average increase in curve size was 12° (range 2°–43°). The syrinx was treated operatively in five children. One child, who underwent foramen magnum decompression, required surgical stabilization of the spine. No neurologic complications were encountered. A compilation of reported cases in the literature was performed and analyzed. This analysis of 98 cases revealed that treatment of the syrinx resulted in no further progression of the scoliosis in 35 of 80 (48%) cases in which the curve history was reported. Surgical stabilization of the curve was required in 27 (31%) cases without neurologic complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it