MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253954756 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.9180

Characterization of a Novel MicroRNA from the T-DNA Locus of Rosewood, an Activation-Tagged Poplar Tree

2018· article· en· W4253954756 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Curtis W. Boswell

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenomicsMutantBiologyPopulationGeneGeneticsBiotechnologyGenomicsGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plant phenomics refers to using the phenotype of mutants to identify genes responsible for a trait of interest. Our lab has created a large population of mutant poplar trees for studying phenomics. Poplar plays an enormous role in biotechnology and biofuel production. By having a large population of organisms with various mutations, genes and interacting partners may be identified. Specifically, we can identify genes responsible for tree stature, wood development, growth rate and pest resistance. The mutant rosewood is characterized by a vibrant red wood due to an accumulation of pelargonidin, the chemical that gives strawberries and cherries their red colour. Previous work on the mutant has shed light on the possibility of a microRNA regulating the biosynthesis of pelargonidin. Elucidating the function of the potential microRNA and its downstream targets will provide insight for applications in plant biotechnology. As well, it will be the first experimental validation of a microRNA in plants that regulates wood properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207