Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Endometriosis can exist in the adolescent female. It can be a very disruptive disease and cause significant dysfunction at a time in life when self-esteem, school attendance, and school performance are critical to achievement of life goals. Approaches to diagnosis and management in the recent literature are reviewed, focusing on those that apply directly to the adolescent or indirectly, by extrapolation from work done in the adult population. Practical strategies for adolescent patient care are presented. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research has focused on the efficacy of current treatment modalities and management of potential adverse side effects. Possible etiologies of endometriosis have been proposed, and therapies directed at those causes are being explored. Methods of diagnosis, both invasive and noninvasive, have been studied in order to determine the most effective way of diagnosing the disease. SUMMARY: A better understanding of the etiology of endometriosis would probably assist in determining the most suitable treatment strategies. Future work in adolescent endometriosis should focus on developing safe, minimally invasive, yet definitive options for diagnosis and treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.090 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".