MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comprehensive Modeling of Large Photovoltaic Systems for Heterogeneous Parallel Transient Simulation of Integrated AC/DC Grid

2021· article· en· W4254012753 on OpenAlexaff
Ning Lin, Shiqi Cao, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePhotovoltaic systemGridTransient (computer programming)Thread (computing)Graphics processing unitScalabilityPower system simulationCentral processing unitComputational scienceParallel computingElectric power systemPower (physics)Electrical engineeringComputer hardwareEngineeringOperating systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detailed nonlinear transient modeling of the photovoltaic (PV) system enables an accurate study of the host integrated AC/DC grid. In this article, the parallel architecture of the graphics processing unit (GPU) catering to a massive number of PV modules is utilized in conjunction with CPU for efficient transient simulation. To reflect the exact operation status of the solar power system subjected to various temperatures and nonuniform solar irradiance in the electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation, all necessary panels are modeled individually, and therefore, a scalable PV array model with a flexible level of aggregation is proposed in addition to its fully detailed discrete counterpart so as to improve the computational efficiency. The single-instruction multiple-thread implementation mode of the GPU enables up to 10 million PV panels, regardless of the size or type, to be computed concurrently, and noticing that the hybrid AC/DC grid has a significant irregularity, the CPU is also adopted to tackle systems with inadequate parallelism. Meanwhile, since the AC grid dynamic interaction has a distinct tolerance on the time-step to that of the remaining part, a multi-rate scheme is employed to expedite the heterogeneous CPU-GPU computation for dynamic-EMT co-simulation, whose results are validated by the commercial off-line tools MATLAB/Simulink and DSATools/TSAT,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207