MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ten years of <scp>EMCD</scp> : what has been achieved

2016· other· en· W4254043444 on OpenAlexaff
P. Schattschneider, Thomas Schachinger, Stefan Löffler

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Microscopy Congress 2016: Proceedings · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectronPhysicsMagnetic momentSpintronicsMagnetic circular dichroismAngular momentumSpin (aerodynamics)Atomic physicsOpticsCondensed matter physicsFerromagnetismSpectral lineQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy loss magnetic chiral dichroism (EMCD), established in 2006 [1] celebrates its 10 th anniversary. EMCD is the TEM equivalent of the X‐ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) technique routinely applied on synchrotron beam lines for the study of magnetic moments. The EMCD signal is detected as an asymmetry in the energy filtered diffraction pattern, or alternatively as a slight difference in the fine structure of energy loss spectra for particular momentum transfers in the inelastic interaction (Fig. 1). The extremely high spatial resolution of modern TEMs makes EMCD interesting for spintronic and micromagnetic applications. In the last decade, the technique has evolved into a reliable tool demonstrating nm‐resolution, site selectivity and separation of spin and orbital moments via sum rules. One of the consequences of EMCD is that the outgoing inelastically scattered probe electrons have topological charge. Structurally, they are identical with vortex electrons that can be routinely created in the electron microscope [2]. Such vortices are characterized by a spiraling wavefront and a phase singularity at the center, similar to optical vortices that were first described by Nye &amp; Berry [3]. Owing to their short wavelength, these matter waves can be focused to atomic size. Another novel aspect is their magnetic moment, quantized in multiples of the Bohr magneton, independent of the electron spin. These features make electron vortices extremely attractive as a nanoscale probe for magnetic materials. The discovery of vortex electron beams has spurred efforts to use them for EMCD because of their intrinsic chirality. It became soon clear that atom‐sized vortices are needed to achieve this goal [4], as shown in Fig. 2. At the time of writing, the closest successful approach to such beams is the shaping of the incident wave front with a Cs corrector such that it matches the point group symmetry of the selected atomic column, revealing EMCD signals with atomic resolution [5]. A promising alternative is the use of holographic vortex filters in the outgoing beam to detect spin polarized transitions [6], as sketched in Fig. 3. Other than in the standard EMCD geometry, this approach does not require a precise alignment of the crystal, and would thus allow the study of nanocrystalline and amorphous materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Microscopy Congress 2016: ProceedingsSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207