MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254068474 · doi:10.1353/cjl.2008.0001

Introduction

2006· article· fr· W4254068474 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Avery, Alexandra D’Arcy, Keren Rice

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic Variation and Morphology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)World EnglishesLinguisticsHistoryEnglish languageLibrary scienceAustralian EnglishSociologyMedia studiesComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Peter Avery, Alexandra D'Arcy, and Keren Rice The past twenty-five years have seen an enormous growth in research into World Englishes, reflecting a new recognition of the status of the many national English dialects. Canadian English has been no exception to this trend and we have witnessed a dramatic increase in the quantity and quality of research into this variety. The stature it is now accorded as a separate dialect of English is reflected in the number of dictionaries, thesauruses, usage guides, and other reference works published since the late 1990s that were devoted specifically to Canadian English (e.g., Guide to Canadian English usage; Canadian Oxford dictionary; Oxford Canadian Dictionary; Collins essential Canadian English dictionary and thesaurus; Fitzhenry and Whiteside Canadian thesaurus) as well as audio-visual productions (e.g., Dialects of Canadian English; Talking Canadian). Despite this exciting research activity, a conference devoted solely to research on Canadian English had yet to take place. In order to celebrate Jack Chambers' seminal contribution to the understanding of Canadian English, the Department of Linguistics at the University of Toronto organized a conference to reflect the vibrancy of contemporary research on Canadian English. The conference, held in January 2005, aimed to address the following questions: • What are the characteristics of Canadian English that distinguish it from other English dialects? • How does Canadian English vary across the nation? • What changes are occurring in Canadian English right now? [End Page 99] • How has Canadian English been influenced by contact with other languages such as Aboriginal languages, French, and the many immigrant languages it has come into contact with? • What effect does American English have on Canadian speech? • What is the role of Canadian English in the context of World English? The conference was an exciting event, filled with talks, video presentations, audio presentations, and research posters. The full range of topics was covered: the history of Canadian English, phonological characteristics that distinguish Canadian English, morphosyntactic changes that are taking place in the variety, acoustic analyses of the vowel system, studies of dialect perception, and effects of French on English and of English on French, among others. The articles in this volume represent the richness of presentations at the conference as well as the diversity of the presenters themselves, ranging from graduate students to established and world-renowned specialists. We begin with a section called 'Sounds Canadian'. The first two articles in this section focus on Canadian Raising, a term coined by Jack Chambers and a process that has been central to Chambers' research paradigm. In the opening paper, Chambers provides a comprehensive review of this phonological phenomenon, tracing the earliest attestations of Canadian Raising in Canada and reviewing current work on the topic, including some of the instrumental phonetic work that has been done recently. He argues that-despite some of his own earlier predictions-Canadian Raising persists hardily in Canada. In the second paper, William Idsardi argues that Canadian Raising is indeed a process in Canadian English, and provides evidence for this. He adduces evidence against a recent claim that Canadian Raising is not an allophonic process, but that the low and raised vowels are contrastive, and thus phonemic. Idsardi provides innovative data, showing that Canadian Raising continues to be allophonic. The next two papers in this section examine vowel systems of two distinct urban contexts. Robert Hagiwara presents data from his project on Winnipeg English. One of the primary goals of this work is to establish baseline data so that researchers can make meaningful comparisons between the vowel systems of different dialects. Hagiwara includes a very interesting discussion of the vowels that result from Canadian Raising. He shows that raising involves a shift in the trajectory of the entire diphthong, a shift that affects the vowel [oI] as well as the raised variants of [aI] and [aʊ]. Pauline Hollett examines the vowels of St. John's English in an attempt to establish whether the 'Canadian Shift', as described in Clarke et al. (1995), is becoming established in Newfoundland. She is able to use [End Page 100] data collected in St. John's 20 years ago, and thus presents a real-time study of the vowel system...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5520.365

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistiqueSame topicLinguistic Variation and MorphologyFrench-language works237,207