MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

2011 AAA Annual Meeting Preview

2011· article· en· W4254120786 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropology News · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThursdayTheme (computing)Library sciencePublishingState (computer science)ManagementConversationHistoryArt historyMedia studiesPolitical scienceSociologyLawTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: TRACES, TIDEMARKS AND LEGACIES: “Montreal Theme Variations” by Sarah Green TRACES, TIDEMARKS AND LEGACIES: “Montreal: Traces of the Past, Intimations of the Future” by Marie Nathalie LeBlanc and Deirdre Meintel “General Meeting Information” FROM THE PRESIDENT: “Meet Sarah Green: Conversation with the 2011 AAA Meeting Executive Program Chair” by Virginia R Dominguez TRACES, TIDEMARKS AND LEGACIES: “Program Even Highlight: Shifting State of Publishing Anthropology” by Sarah Green “AAA Annual Business Meeting: Thursday, November 17, 2011, 6:15–7:30 pm” by Virginia R Dominguez Keywords: association business, Annual Meeting, 2011 Annual Conference, AAA Business Meeting

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.013
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it