MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254135552 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/9fp4v

Neuromatch Academy: a 3-week, online summer school in computational neuroscience

2021· preprint· en· W4254135552 on OpenAlexaff
Bernard Marius ’t Hart, Titipat Achakulvisut, Athena Akrami, Bradly Alicea, Ulrik Beierholm, Gunnar Blohm, Kathryn Bonnen, John S. Butler, Brandon Caie, You Cheng, Hiu Mei Chow, Isaac David, Eric DeWitt, Jan Drugowitsch, Kshitij Dwivedi, Pierre-Étienne Fiquet, Jérémy Forest, Byron Galbraith, Qinglong Gu, Pankaj Gupta, Alexandre Hyafil, Konrad P. Körding, Arvind Kumar, Patrick Mineault, John D. Murray, Megan A. K. Peters, Paul Schrater, Carsen Stringer, Pascal Wallisch, Brad Wyble

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational neuroscienceComponent (thermodynamics)Focus (optics)Complement (music)Cover (algebra)Cognitive scienceComputer scienceComputational modelNeuroscienceFunction (biology)PsychologyBrain functionData scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuromatch Academy (https://neuromatch.io/academy) was designed as an online summer school to cover the basics of computational neuroscience in three weeks. The materials cover dominant and emerging computational neuroscience tools, how they complement one another, and specifically focus on how they can help us to better understand how the brain functions. An original component of the materials is its focus on modeling choices, i.e. how do we choose the right approach, how do we build models, and how can we evaluate models to determine if they provide real (meaningful) insight. This meta-modeling component of the instructional materials asks what questions can be answered by different techniques, and how to apply them meaningfully to get insight about brain function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207