MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254147212 · doi:10.1190/tle23070704.1

Reviews

2004· article· en· W4254147212 on OpenAlexaff
Sven Treitel, Michael A. Slawiński, William R. Green, Ronald Green

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsBC StudiesMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismogramInterpretation (philosophy)GeologyHumanitiesPhilosophySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Seismic Wavefield, Volume II: Interpretation of Seismograms on Regional and Global Scales by Brian L.N. Kennett. ISBN 0-521-80946-0 (hardback) and ISBN 0-521-00665-1 (paperback), Cambridge, 2002, 534 pp., $120 (hardback), $55 (paperback). Exploring Space, Exploring Earth: New Understanding of the Earth from Space Research by Paul Lowman. ISBN 0-521-89062-4, Cambridge, 2002, 362 pp., $40 (paperback) Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. 3rd ed. by John C. Davis. ISBN 0-471-17275-8, Wiley, 2002, Xvi + 638 pp. $87.95

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3290.285

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207