Antimicrobial Activity of Subinhibitory Concentrations of Ciprofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa as Determined by the Killing Curve Method and the Postantibiotic Effect
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This investigation used the postantibiotic effect (PAE) and killing curves to examine the antimicrobial activity of subinhibitory (1/8x, 1/4x and 1/2x MIC) and inhibitory (1x MIC) concentrations of ciprofloxacin against mucoid (M) and nonmucoid (NM) urinary isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Subinhibitory concentrations (1/8x, 1/4x and 1/2x MIC) of ciprofloxacin produced PAEs with no difference between M and NM strains. For NM strains, those with low MICs (< or = 1.0 mg/l) to ciprofloxacin produced significantly longer PAEs than isolates with high MICs (> 1 mg/l). Killing curve studies demonstrated that subinhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin produce little effect (1/8x MIC) or stasis (1/4x and 1/2x MIC) of growth for several hours. Only 1x MIC was bactericidal for several strains. At 1/2x and 1x MIC, bacterial inhibition was greater against NM versus M isolates. The M phenotype of P. aeruginosa reduces killing by ciprofloxacin but not the PAE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".