Safety and Efficacy of Tacrolimus Ointment 0.1% (Protopic™) in Atopic Dermatitis: A Canadian Open-Label Multicenter Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Most previously published trials of topical tacrolimus in atopic dermatitis were of relatively short duration and comprised a limited population with moderate-to-severe disease. Objective: The goal of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy over a 6-month period of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment in children and adults with a broader severity spectrum of atopic dermatitis. Methods: An open-label multicenter trial in patients 2 years and older was used. Primary safety and tolerability assessments included skin infection and application site adverse events. Efficacy parameters were body surface area involvement, pruritus score, and overall reponse. Results: There were 240 patients recruited at 23 study sites. Significant improvement from baseline was noted for all efficacy endpoints in both pediatric and adult patients. Skin infections occurred in 26% of patients. Burning sensation with product application, reported by 38% of patients, was transient and of mild-to-moderate severity in the majority. Conclusion: Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment was safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in treatment of atopic dermatitis in children and adults over six months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".