MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254205698 · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2021.37238

Comparative Analysis of Brake Disc Materials

2021· article· en· W4254205698 on OpenAlexaff
Prof. Santosh A N

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBrake Systems and Friction Analysis
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisc brakeCast ironMaterials scienceFinite element methodBrakeBrake padMechanical engineeringTitanium alloyRotor (electric)AlloyComposite materialStructural engineeringMetallurgyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A brake is a device that applies artificial frictional resistance to a revolving disc in order to stop the vehicle from moving, the frictional heat created at the disc pad interface can cause high temperature during the braking period, thermal elastic stability(TEI), early wear, brake fluid vaporization (BFV), and thermally stimulated vibrations can caused by frictional heat produced on the rotor surface (TEV), better thermal stability materials will decrease these causes, we investigate the thermal and structural characteristics in this research by finite element software, the solid brake disc is made up of various materials such as titanium alloy, structured steel and gray cast iron, further we analyze the brake disc using ANSYS 16.0 and CATIA V5 is used to design the model of brake disc, for this project the heat flux calculation have been made by considering various parameters of material as well as vehicle, finally a comparison made between grey cast iron, titanium alloy and structural steel materials. With respect to equivalent stress, temperature distribution, deformation values. This paper involves selecting a best suitable material to design a brake disc which leads to better safety to passengers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologySame topicBrake Systems and Friction AnalysisFrench-language works237,207