MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254221470 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2013-0048

CONSTRUCTION OF AN ELEMENTARY MODEL FOR THE DYNAMIC ANALYIS OF A PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR

2013· article· en· W4254221470 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chiung-Wen Tsai, Chunkuan Shih, Jong-Rong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoolantControl rodThermal hydraulicsPressurized water reactorNuclear engineeringMechanicsNeutronNuclear reactorDelayed neutronNuclear reactor coreHydraulicsPhysicsHeat transferNuclear physicsNeutron temperatureThermodynamicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A lumped-parameter numerical model was constructed based on the conservation laws of mass and energy and the point neutron kinetics with 6 groups of delayed neutron to represent the dynamics of a pressurized water reactor core. On the viewpoint of control theory, the coupled phenomenon of neutron kinetics and thermal-hydraulics can be recognized as a dynamic system with feedback loops by the Doppler effect and the coolant temperature. Scilab was implemented to construct the equivalent transfer functions and associated feedback loops of a PWR core. The dynamic responses were performed by the perturbations of positive reactivity insertion, coolant flow rate, and coolant inlet temperature. This elementary PWR core model has been qualitatively assessed against independent numerical data to ensure the models and codes have a certain level of confidence or validation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207