MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4254230290 · doi:10.5194/tc-2020-63

Proglacial icings as records of winter hydrological processes

2020· preprint· en· W4254230290 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anna Chesnokova, Michel Baraër, Émilie Bouchard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTributaryGlacierEnvironmental scienceSubarctic climateSurface runoffHydrology (agriculture)WatershedAquiferStreamflowSnowGroundwaterPhysical geographyGeologyDrainage basinOceanographyGeomorphologyGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The ongoing warming of cold regions is affecting hydrological processes, causing deep changes such as a ubiquitous increase in river winter discharges. The drivers of this increase are not yet fully identified, mainly due to the lack of observations and field measurements in cold and remote environments. In order to provide new insights into the sources generating winter runoff, the present study explores the possibility to extract information from icings that form over the winter and are often still present early in the summer. Primary sources detection is performed using time lapse camera (TLC) images of icings found in both proglacial fields and upper alpine meadows in June 2016 in two subarctic glacierized catchments in the upper part of the Duke watershed, St. Elias Mountains, Yukon. As TLC alone are not sufficient to entirely cover a large and hydrologically complex area, we explore the possibility to compensate that limit by four supplementary methods based on natural tracers: (a) stable water isotopes, (b) water ionic content, (c) dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and (d) cryogenic precipitates. Interpretation of the combined results shows a complex hydrological system where multiple sources contribute to icings growth over the studied winter. Glaciers of all sizes, directly or through the aquifer, represent the major parent water source for icings formation in the studied proglacial areas. Groundwater-fed hillslope tributaries, possibly connected to suprapermafrost layers, make up the other detectable sources in icing remnants. If confirmed in other cold regions, those results will suggest orienting winter flow trend studies toward a multi-causal hypothesis in glacierized catchments. More generally, this study shows the potential of using icing formations as a new, barely explored source of information on cold regions’ winter hydrological processes that can contribute to overcoming the paucity of observations in these regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→