MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4254259431 · doi:10.5194/acp-2020-255

Optical properties and composition of viscous organic particles found in the Southern Great Plains

2020· preprint· en· W4254259431 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Matthew Fraund, Daniel Bonanno, Swarup China, Don Q. Pham, Daniel P. Veghte, Johannes Weis, Gourihar Kulkarni, Ken Teske, Mary K. Gilles, Alexander Laskin, Ryan C. Moffet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBiological and Environmental ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOffice of ScienceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationUniversity of SaskatchewanCanadian Light SourceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsAerosolTotal organic carbonChemical compositionChemistrySea saltXANESMineralogyEnvironmental chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Spectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Atmospheric high viscosity organic particles (HVOP) were observed in samples of ambient aerosol collected on April and May 2016 in the Southern Great Plains of the United States. These particles were apportioned as either airborne soil organic particles (ASOP) or tar balls (TB) from biomass burning based on spetro-microscopic imaging and assessment of meteorological records of smoke and precipitation data. Regardless of their apportionment, the number fractions of HVOP were positively correlated (R2 = 0.85) with increased values of Ångström absorption exponent (AAE) measured in-situ for ambient aerosol at the site. Extending this correlation to 100 % HVOP yields an AAE of 2.6, similar to previous literature reports of the class of light absorbing organic particles known as brown carbon (BrC). Although there are chemical similarities between ASOP and TB, they can be distinguished based on composition inferred from near edge absorption X-ray fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy. ASOP were distinguished from TB based on their average −COOH/C=C and −COOH/COH peak ratios, with ASOP having lower ratios. NEXAFS spectra of filtered soil organic brine particles nebulized from field samples of standing water deposited after rain were consistent with ASOP when laboratory particles were generated by bubble bursting at the air-organic brine interface. However, particles generated by nebulizing the bulk volume of soil organic brine had particle composition different from ASOP. These observations are consistent with the raindrop generation mechanism responsible for ASOP emissions in the area of study. In contrast, nebulized samples carry with them higher fractions soil inorganics dissolved in the bulk volume of soil brine that are not aerosolized by the raindrop mechanism. Our results support the bubble bursting mechanism of particle generation during rainfall resulting in the ejection of soil organics into the atmosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→