MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254290391 · doi:10.1002/jnm.625

Guest editorial

2006· editorial· en· W4254290391 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manos M. Tentzeris, D. Staiculescu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Numerical Modelling Electronic Networks Devices and Fields · 2006
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceElectronic engineeringMonolithic microwave integrated circuitWirelessNetwork topologyElectronic circuitMicrowaveElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances in wireless and microwave communication systems (higher operation frequency bands, more compact topologies containing MMICs and MEMS, wideband automotive, space and biomedical modules) have increased the necessity of fast and accurate numerical simulation techniques. Unlike hybrid microwave integrated circuits at low frequencies, it is extremely difficult and essentially impossible to adjust the circuit and radiation characteristics of communication modules once they are fabricated. For this reason, many practical geometries, especially in microwave and millimeter-wave integrated circuits (MMIC), packaging, interconnects, sub-nanosecond digital electronic circuits [such as multi-chip modules (MCM)], and antennas used in wireless and microwave communication systems, have been left relatively untreated due to their complexity and the inability of the existing techniques to deal with requirements for large size and high resolution. The starting point for the development of efficient numerical algorithms is an accurate characterization of the passive and active structures involved in the topologies. Although most commercial CAD programs are based on curve-fitting formulas and lookup tables and not on accurate numerical characterization, the latter can be used if it is fast enough. In addition, it can be used to generate lookup tables and to check the accuracy of empirical formulas. Any numerical method for characterization needs to be as efficient and economical as possible in both CPU time and temporary storage requirement, although recent rapid advances in computers impose less severe restrictions on the efficiency and economy of the method. Another important aspect in the development of numerical methods has been the versatility of the method. In reality, however, numerical methods are chosen on the basis of trade-offs between accuracy, speed, storage requirements, versatility, etc. and are often structure dependent. The extensive recent developments in the area of time-domain numerical methods have established them among the major simulation, modelling and optimization tools, especially for ultrawideband and mixed-domain (solid-state, electromagnetic, digital, mechanical, thermal) components and modules, since they offer a very accurate representation of the real time-domain field variations. Their—mostly—parallelized nature enables their further acceleration with the aid of modern multiprocessor computers and modern parallelized computer cluster environments. The Sixth International Workshop on Computational Electromagnetics in the Time-Domain was held at Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A., in 12–14 September 2005. It was attended by researchers around the globe, including Canada, France, Germany, Japan, United Kingdom, South Korea and United States. This Special Issue is a selection of the papers presented in the workshop. It represents part of the current progress and state-of-the-art in time-domain electromagnetic computational techniques. The first paper by Essakhi et al. discusses the global time-domain circuit simulation of a microwave rectenna. Next, a paper by Bommaraju et al. introduces a novel low-dispersive (2, 2) collocated FDTD scheme, while a paper by Ahmed et al. deals with improved-accuracy ADI-FDTD methods. The following paper by Carrion et al. proposes a new PML termination of conductive media for FDTD simulations for Bodies of Revolution. Chu et al. report in their paper the design of microwave structures combining MEFISTO-3D NOVA and MATLAB toolboxes. The next two papers focus on developments concerning TLM. Biwojno et al. [CEM-TD 2005 Best paper award] describe the development of a TLM mode with arbitrary embedded objects, while Lukashevich et al. introduce system identification and model order reduction to the TLM analysis. Last, but not least, Il-Suek Koh et al. give an overview of a semi-analytical time-domain formulation for low-frequency scattering. I would like to close with special acknowledgements to Dr Wolfgang Hoefer for his very insightful advise concerning the planning and the organization of the conference, to Dr Daniela Staiculescu for her valuable help with the review process of the submitted papers to this special issue and to Dr Samir El-Ghazaly for co-chairing the conference. We hope that this Special Issue provides readers with useful information on the CEM-TD and an additional motivation for the participation in the next CEM-TD conference to be held in Perugia, Italy on 15–17 October 2007.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Numerical Modelling Electronic Networks Devices and FieldsSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207