MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Idea

2013· book-chapter· en· W4254306970 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean‐Luc Nancy, Philip M. Armstrong

Bibliographic record

VenueFordham University Press eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This section focuses on form as the “idea,” the word used by Plato to designate the intelligible models of the real. According to Plato, idea signifies nothing other than “visible form.” One must understand that “sense or truth” does not constitute simply the “intelligibility” of the sensible. At the same time, this intelligibility is simply a more demanding, more intense grasp of sensible propriety itself. The word drawing initially took on the value associated with a sketch or a study. Also included in this section is a “Sketchbook” of quotations on art from Chantelou, Antoine de Laval, Eugène Delacroix, and Wassily Kandinsky.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1330.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFordham University Press eBooksSame topicGerman Literature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207