Effects of serotonin on the physiology of the rabbit small intestine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Serotonin has been shown to alter the intestinal transport of ions and intestinal motility. These effects may interfere with each other, modulating the whole physiology of the intestine. We have previously shown that serotonin also alters the transport of nutrients. Thus, the aims of the present work were to determine the possible interference between the secretagogue effect of serotonin and the mechanism by which serotonin inhibits the absorption of nutrients, and to study the effect of serotonin on the digestive activity of nutrients of the brush border membrane jejunum enterocyte in the rabbit. The results show that the secretagogue effect of serotonin neither affects the inhibitory effect of serotonin on the intestinal absorption of the nutrients, nor affects the activity of Na+/K+-ATPase. The activity of sucrase and aminopeptidase N was also not affected by serotonin in the rabbit jejunum. Finally, we also studied different parameters of the motility in the rabbit small intestine. Serotonin seemed to stimulate the motility of the rabbit small intestine by increasing integrated mechanical activity and tone of muscle fibers in duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. In conclusion, serotonin might alter or modulate the whole intestinal physiology. Key words: serotonin, small intestine, motility, absorption, rabbit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".