MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

This issue of <i>Acta</i>

2010· article· en· W4254350149 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Einar Stefánsson

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Ophthalmologica · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOphthalmologyMedicineRetinalBlood flowOptometryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cover figure shows a choroidal metastasis shown by Yao et al. as an electronically published letter to the editor with this issue of the journal. Yours truly along with Professor Frank Holz in Bonn discuss the lack of theoretical research and publications in ophthalmology and medicine and ask whether Einstein would have been published in ophthalmology. Acta is in the process of publishing a series of review articles on retinal blood flow technology. In this issue two review articles are published on this subject. Garhofer and the Ocular Blood Flow Research Association review the use of the retinal vessel analyzer in ocular blood flow research. In the second review paper Sugiyama and the Ocular Blood Flow Research Association describe laser speckle flowgraphy and how this has been used in ocular blood flow research. Mansour et al. in Lebanon, USA, India and Germany report a multicenter retrospective case series of retinal vascular events following intravitreal bevacizumab injections. These include central retinal arterial occlusions, branch retinal arterial occlusions and central and branch retinal vein occlusion. Konstantinidis et al. in Switzerland describe retinal pigment epithelial tears, which they found in 5% of patients following intravitreal ranibizumab injection for classic choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Delgado et al. in Portugal recorded spontaneous oscillations in choroidal blood flow in rabbits which is influenced by endothelin-1. Pueyo et al. in Spain used optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry to detect subclinical ganglion cell loss in patients with multiple sclerosis. Yeung et al. in Taiwan found a positive correlation between long term heamoglobin A1c levels and macular thickness and volume in diabetic patients without overt diabetic macular oedema. Sturm et al. in Switzerland and Canada describe retinal involvement in hemolytic uraemic syndrome. Kofoed et al. in Copenhagen describe a case of retinal ischemia following ranibizumab administration. Cui et al. in China and Denmark found adenosine receptor protein expressed in the retina, choroid and sclera in guinea pigs and suggest that they play a role in the regulation of eye growth. Berisha et al. in Austria examine whether myopia is associated with decreased choroidal blood flow. They found that pulsative ocular blood flow decreases with increasing axial length and volume. Kanthan et al. in Australia found no significant association between exogenous oestrogen exposure after menopause on the long term incidence of cataract in an elderly female population. Wang et al. in China and Sweden report that ultraviolet radiation increases opacification of the lens in rats and changes their redox balance of the lens. Carter et al. in England suggest that genetic defects in the immune system may contribute to postoperative endophthalmitis. Kaeser and Borruat in Switzerland describe a clinical test to evaluate visual function in patients with cerebellar dysfunction. Gothwal et al. in Australia and Singapore question the validity of the visual function index, a questionnaire previously used to assess the outcome of cataract surgery. Takai et al. in Japan report macular edema as a sign of subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. These publications are a part of this issue of Acta and are accessible on http://www.actaophthalmologica.com. Varma et al. in USA suggest that caffeine protects against cataract formation caused by selenite in rats. Carreno et al. in Spain and USA found a number of cytokines and chemokines in tear film and stress that the tear film has considerable immunological role. Yuki et al. in Japan describe increased serum antioxidants and suggest an increased oxidative stress in patients with normal tension glaucoma compared to healthy controls. Hernandez-Verdejo et al. in Spain measured the anterior chamber and vitreous cavity pressure simultaneously and suggest that measurements in the vitreous cavity are influenced by the viscosity of the vitreous gel. Biro and Schvöler in Hungary add to the observation of Tan et al. on visual sensations during cataract surgery and Dr. Tan responds.Wackernagel et al. in Austria treat retinal haemangioblastoma with systemic bevacizumab. Uhlig et al. in Germany and UK followed gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy for 15 years. Huemer et al. in Austria study viral tissue damage in human cornea in vitro. Han et al. in Korea found reduced corneal sensitivity in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. Reeks and Ang in Scotland reviewed reports of ocular adverse drug reactions. Zejmo et al. in Poland found an association between high myopia and human leucocyte antigens. Yao et al. in Taiwan describe a regression of choroidal metastasis from breast carcinoma with bevacizumab injection as is also shown on the cover of the journal. Jonas and Schmidbauer in Germany treated a retinal macroaneurysm with bevacizumab. Velikay-Parel describes a new method to fix epiretinal implants. Woo et al. in Korea describe a marginal success from treating macular holes secondary to uveitis. Kandori et al. in Japan used a 25-gauge vitreous cutter to perform pupilloplasty. Forooghian et al. in USA found Gallium scintigraphy useful in investigating retinal vasculitis. Hirakata et al. in Japan show scanning electron microscopic photographs of the internal limiting membrane in patients. Wolf et al. in Germany used intravitreal bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization in uveitis. Folgosa et al. in Brazil and USA combined intravitreal triamcinolone and bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. The entire issue of Acta is available electronically on http://www.actaophthalmologica.com, which I hope the readers will enjoy in addition to the printed version.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa OphthalmologicaSame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207