Vortex-induced vibrations of the Second Severn Crossing cable-stayed bridge—full-scale and wind tunnel measurements
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the first winter after opening, the Second Severn Crossing cable-stayed bridge exhibited occasional vortex-induced vertical oscillations. Vortex excitation had been detected by the wind tunnel tests on sectional models during design and an aerodynamic solution partly developed but, based on damping and turbulence assumptions from recognised design codes, it had been concluded that the probability of large vibrations occurring was small. Full-scale monitoring of both wind and structural response enabled the causes of the observed oscillations to be investigated. The structural damping and wind turbulence were found to differ significantly from the assumed values. Additional wind tunnel tests were undertaken using the full-scale measured values with a view to replicating the full-scale behaviour and developing a solution. Taking into consideration the revised damping and turbulence and an often-ignored factor to correct for the full-scale mode shape, good agreement between the model and full-scale measurements was obtained. Also, aerodynamic solutions were further explored, as a result of which baffle plates were installed under the bridge. Since their installation, no further signs of vortex-induced oscillations have been observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it