MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enfermería de práctica avanzada: praxis, políticas y profesión

2021· article· es· W4254462991 on OpenAlexaff
Ricardo A. Ayala, Pierre Pariseau‐Legault

Bibliographic record

VenueGerencia y Políticas de Salud · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Health and Social Inequalities
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este artículo presentamos un análisis crítico de la transformación que ha tenido la profesión de enfermería luego de la institucionalización de la práctica avanzada (EPA). Hacemos un repaso del desarrollo histórico de la EPA –principalmente en Estados Unidos y Canadá–, y discutimos las implicancias culturales y legales para la práctica de enfermería y para las enfermeras como sujetos sociales. En tanto esta reflexión permite planear una nueva agenda de investigación en el área de la salud, surge una preocupación sobre la contradicción interna en torno a la medicalización, como también sobre la necesidad de evaluar cuidadosamente la transferencia de esta política a otros sistemas de salud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.023
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGerencia y Políticas de SaludSame topicPublic Health and Social InequalitiesFrench-language works237,207