Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This session described the 2015 pilot project and ongoing cooperation between the International ISSN Centre based in Paris and ProQuest to identify active titles without ISSN.The project is using Ulrich's periodicals database as the initial resource.Under the supervision of the International Centre, national ISSN centers determine whether the ISSN is simply missing or has never been assigned.The outcome of the project will be a benefit to librarians, publishers, and vendors as more titles will have ISSN registered with the national and international ISSN centers and in Ulrich's Periodical Database.This will improve the electronic loading and matching of titles.Gaëlle Béquet, director of the International ISSN Centre, and Laurie Kaplan of ProQuest discussed how the project came to be, the pilot work and refinements to the process, and the ongoing work and schedule for going forward.The audience was encouraged to ask questions and help determine the best way to encourage all interested parties to use the ISSN as an identifier whenever possible.Librarians, publishers, content vendors, subscription agents, discovery systems, and others need to exchange data on a daily basis.And anything that can make this process more successful by improving the ability to match updates to existing records is of great interest to these parties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it