MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W42544815

Motivational factors that impact English language learning in an Arab model school, Jordan : an empirical investigation

2013· article· en· W42544815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K. Sarojani Devi Krishnan, Qusai Ali Khalaf Al-Lafi, Zahid Hussain Pathan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMathematics educationTest (biology)Language acquisitionSample (material)Empirical researchEnglish languageDescriptive statisticsPedagogy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractMotivation is one of key factors impacting successful English language learning in EFL settings. In order that language is acquired effectively by learners, it is essential that factors that motivate language learning be identified. In Jordan, mastering English language has become a critical issue as students need to pass Tajwahi, university entrance English test before furthering their studies at tertiary level which will secure them a professional job and high status in society in future. Hence, this study investigates factors that motivate high school Jordanian students to learn English in an Arab Model School. The research design adopted was mixed-methods approach. The sample comprised 80 10th grade students. The socio-educational model by Gardner (1985) was used as theoretical framework for this study. A questionnaire adapted from Gardner's (1985) Attitude/Motivation Test Battery was used to elicit information on motivational factors that influenced students' learning of English. Descriptive statistics was used to analyse data. Interviews were also conducted with 10 students selected from sample to gain in-depth insights into above-mentioned motivating factors. The findings of study depicted four factors in descending order of importance: parental encouragement, social factor, desire to learn English, and teacher's style. The findings were significant in providing information to relevant authorities so that efforts can be taken as appropriate to motivate students to acquire English language effectively for their educational and professional benefits in future.Keywords: language motivation, language learning, acquisition, EFL, proficiencyINTRODUCTIONMotivation is key to learning (Dornyei, 2001). It refers to inner source, desire, emotion, reason, need, impulse or purpose that moves an individual towards a particular action. Gardner (1985) defines second language acquisition (L2) as the extent to which an individual works or strives to learn language because of a desire to do so and satisfaction experienced in this activity (p.10). Ormrod (2000) states that motivation is something that energizes, directs and sustains behavior; it gets students moving, points them in a particular direction, and keeps them going. From perspective of social psychology, Moiinvaziri (2008) claims that learning a target language is linked to individual's social dispositions towards target language community. In essence, Gardner (1990) describes in second or foreign language learning as comprising three main elements, i.e. first, a desire to learn language, second, effort expended towards learning language and third, favourable attitudes towards learning language. In other words, in learning a foreign language is a process in which a learner has desire, persistence and a positive attitude to achieve goal of learning target language. Other definitions of can be categorized under behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism (Brown, 2007). With reference to second language acquisition in particular, is best classified as extrinsic versus intrinsic and integrative versus instrumental motivation. Gardner and Lambert (1972) suggests that a learner who is integratively-motivated learns a language to be identified with wider target language community. An instrumentally-motivated learner, on other hand, learns target language to achieve functional goals such as obtaining a degree, gain social recognition or a good job. In their study in Canada, findings suggest that learners of French language with an integrative motive achieved higher proficiency in language learning as compared to those who were instrumentally-motivated.Research conducted by Gardner concentrated on as well as other factors that impacted a learner's success in L2 acquisition . …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.292
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy StudiesSame topicEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningFrench-language works237,207