MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254497880 · doi:10.14740/jnr462w

Remission of Chronic Acquired Demyelinating Polyneuropathy Associated With Paraproteinemia After Removal of Skull Plasmacytoma

2017· article· en· W4254497880 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sung-Yeon Sohn, Jin-Ok Kim, Soo Joo Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParaproteinemiaPlasmacytomaPolyneuropathyBiopsyChronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathyEtiologyPathologySurgeryMultiple myelomaInternal medicineAntibodyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy can be caused by various etiologies. Although chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is the most common chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy, currently there is no suitable biomarker to diagnose CIDP; hence misdiagnosis of CIDP has not been unusual. Herein, we present a patient with initially presumed CIDP, who maintains disease remission after early surgical removal of solitary plasmacytoma during 1-year follow-up. A 55-year-old woman was referred to our hospital due to progressive upper and lower extremity weakness from 6 months ago. Nerve conduction study findings were compatible with acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy, fulfilling electrodiagnostic criteria of CIDP. Serum electrophoresis suggested monoclonal gammopathy of lambda type, but the bone marrow biopsy showed no evidence of neoplastic plasma cell infiltration. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed an osteolytic mass involving the right parietal skull and adjacent dura mater. Total excision of the skull mass was performed. The biopsy result was compatible with plasmacytoma. Even without long term administration of high dose corticosteroid, the patient not only has continued to improve clinically, but also showed markedly improved electrophysiological findings during 1-year follow-up. J Neurol Res. 2017;7(6):108-111 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr462w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology ResearchSame topicPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersFrench-language works237,207