MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4254503304 · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2xnmv

Music improves social communication and brain connectivity outcomes in children with autism: A randomized controlled trial

2018· preprint· en· W4254503304 on OpenAlexaff
Megha Sharda, Carola Tuerk, Rakhee Chowdhury, Kevin Jamey, Nicholas Hd Foster, Melanie Custo-Blanch, Mélissa Tan, Aparna Nadig, Krista L. Hyde

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityInternational Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound ResearchCentre for Research on Brain Language and Music
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusic therapyAutismPsychologyContext (archaeology)Intervention (counseling)Autism spectrum disorderFunctional magnetic resonance imagingRandomized controlled trialResting state fMRIBrain activity and meditationAudiologyDevelopmental psychologyMedicineNeurosciencePsychiatryElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Music has been identified as a strength in people with Autism Spectrum Disorder, however, there is currently no neuroscientific evidence supporting its benefits. Given its universal appeal, intrinsic reward value and ability to modify brain and behaviour, music may be a potential therapeutic aid in autism. Here, we evaluated the neurobehavioral outcomes of a music intervention, compared to a non-music control intervention, on social communication and brain connectivity in school-age children (ISRCTN26821793). Fifty-one 6-12 year olds with autism were randomized to receive 8-12 weeks of music (n=26) or non-music intervention (n=25). The music intervention involved use of improvisational approaches through song and rhythm to target social communication. The non-music control was a structurally-matched behavioural intervention implemented in a non-musical context. Groups were assessed before and after intervention on social communication and resting-state functional connectivity of fronto-temporal brain networks. Communication scores were higher in the music group post-intervention (difference score=4.84, P=.01). Associated post-intervention resting-state brain functional connectivity was greater in music versus non-music groups between auditory and subcortical regions (z=3.94, P<.0001) and auditory and fronto-motor regions (z=3.16, P<.0001). Post-intervention brain connectivity was lower between auditory and visual regions in music compared to non-music groups, known to be over-connected in autism (z=4.01, P<.00001). Post-intervention brain connectivity in the music group was related to communication improvement (z=3.57, P<.0001). This study provides the first evidence that 8-12 weeks of individual music intervention can indeed improve social communication and functional brain connectivity, lending support to further investigations of neurobiologically-motivated models of music interventions in autism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research→French-language works237,207→