MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254543405 · doi:10.21991/c9m66w

RESPECTING DEMOCRATIC ROLES

2011· article· fr· W4254543405 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
The Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin

Bibliographic record

VenueConstitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParliamentCriticismPolitical scienceDemocracyHumanitiesConfusionLawPhilosophyPoliticsPsychologyPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Je suis très contente d’être ici avec vous ce soir1 et d’avoir été invitée à prononcer l’allocution d’ouverture devant cet important auditoire. Il n’arrive pas souvent que les trois pouvoirs de l’État – le législatif, l’exécutif et le judiciaire – se réunissent afin de discuter de leurs responsabilités et de leurs rapports mutuels. There is a lot of confusion about the roles of these branches, to judge from current press. We hear the criticism that the executive is running the country at the expense of Parliament. We are also told that the courts are running the country, at the expense of Parliament and the executive. So where does the truth lie? Quel rôle appartient à chacune de ces institutions?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.038
Scholarly communication0.0170.012
Open science0.0010.013
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConstitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnelSame topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207