MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254569612 · doi:10.3138/cmlr.62.1.221

Grammaire de texte en contexte d'ALAO: une année avec le didacticiel <i>FreeText</i>

2005· article· fr· W4254569612 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marie-Josée Hamel

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente FreeText, un didacticiel pour apprenants de français langue seconde (FLS) de niveau intermédiaire-avancé dont le concept didactique, élaboré par l'auteur à partir d'une approche en grammaire textuelle, propose une étude de la grammaire en contexte, par l'analyse de marques linguistiques qui caractérisent les textes. Y sont décrites les activités portant sur la compréhension et la production en langue seconde (L2) qui exploitent ce concept didactique dans FreeText, ainsi que les ressources et l'interface du didacticiel. La seconde partie de l'article fait le compte rendu d'une expérience pédagogique visant une première utilisation intensive de FreeText dans un contexte réel d'apprentissage, soit un cours universitaire de FLS. On y détaille le syllabus du cours, dont la démarche s'inscrit dans celle de FreeText et on y fait part des observations effectuées concernant la progression du groupe avec le didacticiel durant une année scolaire. La conclusion fait le point sur certaines compétences développées par les apprenants dans le contexte décrit et suggère quelques modifications qui faciliteraient l'utilisation de ce didacticiel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantesSame topicFrench Language Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207