MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254595217 · doi:10.1109/ias.2005.1518437

Testing of a wavelet packet transform-based differential protection for resistance-grounded three-phase transformers

2005· article· en· W4254595217 on OpenAlexaff
S. A. Saleh, M.A. Rahman

Bibliographic record

VenueFourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInrush currentWavelet packet decompositionElectronic engineeringWaveletCurrent transformerTransformerWavelet transformComputer scienceEngineeringControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an extension of real-time tests of a wavelet packet transform (WPT)-based technique for three-phase power transformers differential protection. The proposed technique is implemented using a DS1102 digital signal processor (DSP) board and tested on two different three phase power transformers with neutral resistance-ground. Different magnetizing inrush and internal fault currents are investigated with CT saturation for different loading conditions, including capacitive loads. The results show a complete independence from transformer parameters, load types, grounding method or CT saturation. Furthermore, the proposed technique has high speed, good accuracy, small required memory and reliable responses with reduced computational burden. In all cases of the investigated internal faults, the proposed algorithm is capable of identifying the fault and generating a trip signal in less than a quarter cycle based on 60 Hz system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005.Same topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207