MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Interaction

2018· other· en· W4254676916 on OpenAlexaff
N. J. Enfield, Jack Sidnell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Encyclopedia of Anthropology · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial relationAction (physics)CognitionCognitive scienceSemioticsPsychologyContext (archaeology)Interpretation (philosophy)Socially distributed cognitionSocial cognitionSociologySocial psychologyEpistemologyLinguisticsNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social interaction is central to the lives of many species. In humans it involves higher‐level cognition and complex patterns of mutual engagement, with mechanisms for social fission and fusion in the context of large social groups. Human interaction is a domain of order in itself, articulating a link between the social cognition and motivations of individuals and the higher‐level structures of society and culture. Core features of human interaction include conversational turn taking; repair of problems of speaking, hearing, and understanding; and the formulation and interpretation of social action through language and related semiotic tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2220.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Encyclopedia of AnthropologySame topicLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesFrench-language works237,207