PhylEx: Accurate reconstruction of clonal structure via integrated analysis of bulk DNA-seq and single cell RNA-seq data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We propose PhylEx: a clonal-tree reconstruction method that integrates bulk genomics and single-cell transcriptomics data. In addition to the clonal-tree, PhylEx also assigns single-cells to clones, which effectively produce clonal expression profiles, and generates clonal genotypes. By analyzing scRNA-seq integrated with bulk DNA-seq, PhylEx can take advantage of co-occurrences of the mutations found in the cells. In the probabilistic model underlying PhylEx, the raw read counts from scRNA-seq follow a mixture of Beta-Binomial distributions, which accounts for the sparse nature of single-cell gene expression data; the mixture lessens the penalty caused by mutations not observed due to mono-allelic expression. We rigorously evaluated PhylEx on simulated datasets as well as a biological dataset consisting of a previously well-characterized high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cell line. PhylEx outperformed the state-of-the-art methods by a wide margin both when comparing capacity for clonal-tree reconstruction and capacity for correctly clustering mutations. By analyzing HGSOC and HER2+ breast cancer data, we also show that PhylEx clears the way for phylo-phenotypic analysis of cancer, i.e., that the clonal expression profiles, induced by the cell-to-clone assignments, can be exploited in a manner beyond what is possible with only expression-based clustering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".