MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254704990 · doi:10.1149/ma2019-01/1/108

Lithium Ion Batteries and Next Generation Energy Storage Technology - Adoption to Aircraft and Aerospace

2019· article· en· W4254704990 on OpenAlexaff
Roger Alan Brewer

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerospaceEnergy storageBattery (electricity)Overheating (electricity)Automotive engineeringSystems engineeringSupercapacitorComputer scienceAerospace engineeringElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium ion batteries provide a high energy to weight ratio making the technology attractive for aircraft and aerospace applications. Introducing lithium ion battery technology, as with other types of battery chemistries, can prove challenging for a variety of reasons. As electrical load demands for aircraft increase controlling and harnessing high energy dense solutions will become more critical. The presentation will begin with a basic introduction of lithium ion battery chemistry and evolve into a discussion on the role various aspects play in safely implementing lithium ion batteries on aircraft including the key design drivers and issues that influence system safety. The presentation will also cover key operational modes, applied to aircraft in general, that can drive risk and effect a prudent power system design (cell overheating, voltage “sag” below minimums at low temperatures, etc.) in the integration of battery technologies to an aircraft. Battery design features and attributes that relate to typical operating modes in an airborne platform will also be discussed in some detail. The presentation will next evolve into a narrative on next generation energy storage technologies and supercapacitors (electric double layer devices) and their potential role in evolving airborne applications. Implementation of higher surge supportable energy storage designs, again driven by considerations at cold temperature conditions, will also be discussed. Energy and power density "road mapping targets" for evolving applications will be highlighted along with issues that influence nominal values including, but not limited to, operating temperature (cold and hot temperature extremes) typical of battery installations in harsher Aerospace environments. An illustration will be provided in the presentation of what the ideal aircraft battery looks like including the ability to float on an unregulated aircraft bus (without Batter Management Electronics) with large voltage swings, ripple content as well as other “nice to haves” (including higher packaged battery system Whrs and kilo-Watts per kilo gram than existing). A final summary will wrap up the discussion with an overview of the presentation material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207