Implementation of SLAM, Navigation, Obstacle Avoidance, and Path Planning of a Robust Mobile Robot Using 2D Laser Scanner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Over the last decade, navigation and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) have become key players in developing robust mobile robots. Several SLAM approaches utilizing camera, laser scan, sonar and fusion of sensors were developed and improved by a number of researchers. In this thesis, comparisons of these methods were evaluated, especially those offering low cost benefits, and low computation and memory consumption. The aim of this thesis was to select the most reliable and cost-efficient approach for indoor autonomous robotic applications. Currently, there are numerous studies that have optimized these SLAM methods; however, they still suffer from various complications such as scale drifting and excessive computation. This study performed different experiments to observe these challenges in realworld environments. A modified Pioneer robot was used to implement the selected SLAM system and furthermore, perform obstacle avoidance and path planning in indoor office environments. The results and tests show the reliable performance of Gmapping after tuning its parameter and set right configurations.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".