MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254732703 · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-94851-9_1

Einführung

2003· book-chapter· de· W4254732703 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGabler Verlag eBooks · 2003
Typebook-chapter
Languagede
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsPricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Die Arbeit gliedert sich in fünf Kapitel. Zu Beginn ist dem Leser die Problemstellung und Zielsetzung der Arbeit näher zu bringen. Auf tangierte gesetzliche Grundlagen ist einzugehen. Die Begriffe Risiko und Risikomanagement sind im Rahmen des ersten Kapitels ebenfalls zu definieren. Die literarische Ausarbeitung des Themenkomplexes ist Gegenstand des zweiten Abschnittes, an den sich ein praktischer Beratungsansatz anschließt. Den Vorgang der Systemimplementierung erfährt der Leser im vierten Kapitel. Den Abschluß bilden neben einer Zusammenfassung, ein Ausblick über den Themenkomplex. Zur allgemeinen Veranschaulichung sind im Text Grafiken und Checklisten zu finden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it