MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254736361 · doi:10.2118/2001-086

Impacts of Initial Gas-to-Oil Ratio (GOR) on SAGD Operations

2001· article· en· W4254736361 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jiageng Yuan, T.N. Nasr, D.H.S. Law

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringFossil fuelGeologyEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study addresses the important role of initial gasto-oil ratio (GOR) in steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) operations. A numerical model using CMG's STARS was validated through history matching of laboratory experiments conducted at the Alberta Research Council. The impacts of initial GOR on process performance were then studied using field scale numerical simulations. The results indicate that high initial GOR may have beneficial effects, namely, reduction of oil viscosity, and improvement of the oil-tosteam ratio (OSR). A detrimental impact, however, is also shown as the gas impedes the rate of steam chamber growth, and hence reduces oil production rates. Further analysis indicated that this is because of a "dynamic vacuum" effect due to steam condensation at the front of the steam chamber. This dynamic vacuum effect dominates the diffusion process and creates a gas-rich zone at the front of the steam chamber, thereby resisting further growth of the steam chamber and slowing oil production. The same effect occurs when noncondensable gas was co-injected with steam in either live oil or dead oil reservoirs. Introduction It is generally assumed that when the steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process is applied to a heavy oil reservoir with a high initial gas-to-oil ratio (GOR), there is better production than for a reservoir with low initial GOR. This is a fairly common assumption for good reasons; the mobility of live oil in porous media is usually higher [1] than that of dead oil. The present numerical study was initiated to investigate this assumption. The approach involves history match of 1-D laboratory tests and field scale simulations. The history match was used to verify the numerical techniques and to provide reliable parameters for the use of field scale simulations. The results support the commonly believed assumption of viscosity reduction in 1-D live/dead oil experiments. In field scale simulations, production predictions were compared for reservoirs with different initial GOR. There were additional effects beyond viscosity reduction. These include the long-term reduction of production and improvement in the oil-to-steam ratio (OSR). In this paper, we summarize these activities, analyze the results and discuss possible mechanisms. 1-D EXPERIMENTS A cylindrical model (inside diameter of 9.05 cm and height of 169.1 cm) was used for the experiments. A dynamic boundary control system allowed the surface temperature of the cylinder to be matched with that of the centre, to minimize radial heat loss. The model was packed with sand of 1.5 Darcy at porosity of 36.8%. After packing, the sand was saturated with water, which was then displaced with either "dead" oil or "live" oil. The live oil contained an initial GOR of 7.2 (m3/m3). Steam was controlled by an injection pressure set-point, which delivered slightly superheated steam to the model at about 2100 kPa. Measurements of oil drainage rates and temperature profiles ahead of the steam chamber were made for the two experiments performed. HISTORY MATCH A radial grid in a 2-D configuration was used to simulate the experiments, as shown in Figure 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207