MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254761407 · doi:10.2523/77401-ms

An Evaluation of the Application of Low Field NMR in the Characterization of Carbonate Reservoirs

2002· article· en· W4254761407 on OpenAlexafffundabout
A. Mai, Apostolos Kantzas

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCitationExhibitionComputer scienceLibrary scienceDownloadInformation retrievalField (mathematics)DatabaseWorld Wide WebArchaeologyHistoryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An Evaluation of the Application of Low Field NMR in the Characterization of Carbonate Reservoirs An Mai; An Mai University of Calgary Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Apostolos Kantzas Apostolos Kantzas University of Calgary Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, September 2002. Paper Number: SPE-77401-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/77401-MS Published: September 29 2002 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Mai, An, and Apostolos Kantzas. "An Evaluation of the Application of Low Field NMR in the Characterization of Carbonate Reservoirs." Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, September 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/77401-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractConventional reservoir analysis has always been an extensive process. In order to properly characterize a reservoir, cores and/or logs have to be obtained. Both core and log analysis is expensive and time consuming. NMR is an attractive alternative to these tools due to the fact that in theory, only one measurement is required. However, the conventional methods of interpreting NMR data only seem to work for simple sandstones. A new method of interpreting NMR data is required for complex porous structure such as carbonates.It was found that NMR can predict porosity that is similar to the values obtained by gas expansion. By using the NMR data at fully saturated and irreducible water saturation (Swi), a T2cutoff value was obtained for each sample that separates the bound and movable fluid signals. It was found that T2cutoff for carbonates is not 100 ms as is widely believed by many people who have analyze NMR in carbonates. A correlation for T2cutoff was found as a function of the size of the last peak and its geometric mean. A correlation was also found for Swi, which was a function of the size of the first and last peak.The Free Fluid and the mean T2 permeability models were evaluated. It was seen that the predictions from these models were not adequate. Another permeability model was developed, which is expressed in terms of the size of the first and last peak of the NMR spectrum obtained from the fully saturated sample. It was found that the correlation did a better job of predicting the permeability values. The new model has its own limitations, a method is currently being investigated to overcome these limitations. Despite these limitations, however, the new NMR permeability model provides better estimates of carbonate permeability than any other established methods.IntroductionConventional methods of analyzing the characteristics of carbonate reservoirs usually involve physically analyzing the core samples and/or analyzing the various logs collected from the wells. The important reservoir parameters that are usually investigated are porosity, permeability, and irreducible water saturation. These parameters will give an indication of the amount of hydrocarbons existing in the reservoir and how easy it is to recover them. In order to find these parameters using conventional core analysis, the cores samples taken from the wells first have to be cut and cleaned. The samples are then measured for porosity using one of many options available, and permeability is measured at the dry state. To find Swi, the core samples have to be saturated with brine and spun to the irreducible water condition. Carbonates generally have very tight pore structures, so the process of finding these parameters through core analysis is expensive and time consuming.To determine these reservoir parameters through log analysis, various logs have to be run. Due to limited vertical resolution, the presence of vuggy porosity might not be detected at all1,2. Also, to estimate porosity from logs, lithology components are required3. This causes difficulties in analyzing carbonate reservoirs in which the lithology is quite complex.Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is a fairly recent application in reservoir study and it has garnered major successes in characterizing sandstone reservoirs4. From a single NMR spectrum at the fully saturated conditions, porosity, irreducible water saturation and permeability of these reservoirs could be estimated. However, NMR application in carbonates has not been very successful.This is due to the fact that most earlier works assumed simple lithology and attempted to use the same models as for the sandstone reservoir. Thus the traditional method of interpreting NMR data can often lead to erroneous estimations in complicated porous media such as carbonates4.This paper details an attempt to investigate porosity, permeability and irreducible water saturation by using NMR and Computed Tomography (CT) method to provide details on the pore structure of the carbonate samples. Keywords: porosity, upstream oil & gas, permeability model, permeability, amplitude fraction, pore, secondary porosity fraction, relaxation, application, spe 77401 Subjects: Formation Evaluation & Management, Open hole/cased hole log analysis This content is only available via PDF. 2002. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207