MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254783092 · doi:10.32920/ryerson.14654292

Secret trauma in Ann-Marie MacDonald’s Fall on Your Knees: dissociation, art, and healing

2021· preprint· en· W4254783092 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel A. Smith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParagraphWitnessFall of manPsychoanalysisHistorySexual abuseSubject (documents)FifteenthArt historyPsychologyArtLawClassicsMedicinePolitical sciencePoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Opening paragraph: "Ann-Marie MacDonald opens her debut historical novel, Fall On Your Knees,with a key moment in the life of her protagonist, James Piper. The opening,“One morning, the day before his fifteenth birthday, James awoke with the realization that he could hit his father back” (MacDonald 7), announces both the fact that James has been subject to abuse by his father and, more generally, the novel’s central thematic preoccupation with repeatingpatterns of familial abuse. Throughout the course of the novel, we bear witness as James perpetuates this cycle of violence against his family:he sexually abuses first his child-bride Materia, and then his daughters Kathleen, Mercedes, and Frances. Each of these Piper women either experience sexual abuse firsthand, or as witnesses totheincest,as McDonald explores and traces the long-lasting impacts of familial trauma over five generations during the first half of the twentieth century."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0180.027
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicContemporary Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207