MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4254785290 · doi:10.4000/books.ausonius.9141

Conclusions

2001· book-chapter· fr· W4254785290 on OpenAlexaff
Ségolène Demougin

Bibliographic record

VenueAusonius Éditions eBooks · 2001
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory, Culture, and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au terme de nos deux jours de travaux, nous avons sans aucun doute progressé dans la compréhension du concept d’élite, tel qu’il ressort des études et enquêtes minutieuses présentées ici. Mais si nous avons pu le faire dans les meilleures conditions possibles, c’est en vertu du dynamisme scientifique et de la célèbre hospitalité que nous a prodiguée l’Institut Ausonius. Pendant tout ce temps d’échanges fructueux, nous avons été traités nousmêmes comme des élites, et rien n’a été ménagé pour r...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2000.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAusonius Éditions eBooksSame topicHistory, Culture, and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207