Gas phase constant pressure heat capacities (Cp,gas) for the C1 through C10 straight chain alkanes, isobutane, hydrogen atom, hydroxyl and methyl radicals, and water between 298.15 and 1500 K: A comparison of theoretical values against experimental data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gas phase constant pressure heat capacities (C~p,gas~) for the C~1~ through C~10~ straight chain alkanes, isobutane, hydrogen atom, hydroxyl and methyl radicals, and water were calculated between 298.15 and 1500 K using various low (semiempirical PM6) through high level (CBS-Q//B3 and G4 composite) theoretical methods. All levels of theory provided good agreement with experimental C~p,gas~ data (<+/-10% deviation) regardless of molecular size. A modest but progressive loss of C~p,gas~ predictive accuracy occurs with increasing molecular size among the n-alkanes. For most compounds at all levels of theory, the highest C~p,gas~ estimation accuracy occurs at elevated temperatures, with decreasing accuracy as the temperature is lowered or raised about the method specific accuracy maximum. In general, C~p,gas~ prediction accuracy appears to depend less on the level of theory applied compared to the temperature under consideration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".