MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High energy‐resolution <scp>EELS</scp> of ferroelectric and paraelectric <scp>BaTiO3</scp> phases

2016· other· en· W4254811941 on OpenAlexaff
Matthieu Bugnet, Guillaume Radtke, Steffi Y. Woo, Guo‐zhen Zhu, Gianluigi A. Botton

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Microscopy Congress 2016: Proceedings · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetragonal crystal systemFerroelectricityOctahedronOrthorhombic crystal systemMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsDielectricPhase transitionPhase (matter)CrystallographyChemistryCrystal structureOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BaTiO 3 (BTO) is a widely studied material with several potential applications as a result of its intrinsic ferroelectricity. It undergoes multiple structural phase transitions across a range of accessible temperatures, which have an effect on its ferroelectric properties. While BTO is ferroelectric in its low‐temperature phases—rhombohedral below ∼183 K, orthorhombic in the range ∼183–273 K, and tetragonal in the range ∼273–393 K; it becomes paraelectric above ∼393 K [1]. The ferroelectricity of BTO is directly related to the deviation of the TiO 6 octahedra from perfectly undistorted units, which is linked to the off‐centering of the Ti 4+ cation within a octahedron constituted of six O atoms. Nevertheless, the phase transition mechanisms are still widely discussed, and the exact structure of the paraelectric phase remains unclear. Probing the structural distortion within TiO 6 octahedra of the different BTO phases is therefore of particular interest, especially at the nanoscale for BTO thin films and nanostructures. Recently, it was shown that the O‐K energy‐loss near‐edge structures (ELNES) permitted the probing of this subtle structural distortion [2]. The broadening of the ELNES at lower energy is directly related to the Ti 4+ off‐centering. The O‐site symmetry affects the core‐hole potential created during excitation, which then induces the broadening in the ELNES. In this contribution, the structural distortion of BaTiO 3 (BTO) is studied in its ferroelectric (rhombohedral and tetragonal), and paraelectric phases from the O‐K and Ti‐L 23 near‐edge structures in electron energy‐loss spectroscopy [3]. The high energy‐resolution O‐K and Ti L 23 ELNES of ferroelectric and paraelectric BTO are recorded in a monochromated scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM), using cooling and heating stages to reach the phase transitions in a single crystal thin foil. Modifications of the electronic structure are detected in the lowest energy fine structure of the O‐K edge in the ferroelectric phases (Fig. 1a), and are interpreted by core‐hole valence‐electron screening geometry (Fig. 1c). The broader and more asymmetric lowest energy fine structure at low temperature, suggest that the magnitude of the Ti 4+ off‐centering along ⟨111⟩ increases in lower‐temperature phases. Interestingly, the lowest energy fine structure of the paraelectric phase is comparable to the one obtained at room temperature, hence supporting reports in the literature that the paraelectric phase is actually not cubic [4]. First principles calculations support these experimental evidences: they confirm that the lowest energy fine structure of the O‐K edge is broader for a lower O‐site symmetry, but do not reproduce the asymmetry and the overall shape of this fine structure (Fig. 1b). These discrepancies are ascribed to the approximations inherent to the static core‐hole used within the DFT framework. Furthermore, while the Ti‐L 23 ELNES is commonly used to probe and interpret the structural distortions in titanates, we show that they are only as sensitive as the O‐K ELNES to the structural distortions in BTO (Fig. 2). This finding indicates that the O‐K edge can be used instead of, or complementary to, the Ti‐L 23 edge to probe the structural distortion, and therefore the ferroelectricity, in BTO. The sensitivity of the O‐K edge to subtle structural distortions in BTO shows a new way to probe and better understand the ferroelectricity at the nanoscale, on defective or strained BTO thin films for example [5].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Microscopy Congress 2016: ProceedingsSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207