Innovative management of accelerometry, inertial, acoustic, and satellite data using netCDF and Postgres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2015, as part of the Ocean Tracking Network’s bioprobe initiative, 20 grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) were tagged with a high-resolution (> 30 Hz) inertial tags (> 30 Hz), a depth-temperature satellite tag (0.1 Hz), and an acoustic transceiver on Sable Island for 6 months. Comparable to similar large-scale studies in movement ecology, the unprecedented size of the data (gigabytes for a single seal) collected by these instruments raises new challenges in efficient database management. Here we propose the utility of Postgres and netCDF for storing the biotelemetry data and associated metadata. While it was possible to write the lower-resolution (acoustic and satellite) data to a Postgres database, netCDF was chosen as the format for the high-resolution movement (acceleration and inertial) records. Even without access to cluster computing, data could be efficiently (CPU time) recorded, as 920 million records were written in < 3 hours. ERDDAP was used to access and link the different datastreams with a user-friendly Application Programming Interface. This approach compresses the data to a fifth of its original size, and storing the data in a tree-like structure enables easy access and visualization for the end user.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".